ABSTRACT
Background: Many repurposed drugs have progressed rapidly to Phase 2 and 3 trials in COVID19 without characterisation of Pharmacokinetics /Pharmacodynamics including safety data. One such drug is Nafamostat Mesylate.Methods: We present the findings of a phase Ib/II open label, platform randomised controlled trial of intravenous Nafamostat in hospitalised patients with confirmed COVID-19 pneumonitis. Patients were assigned randomly to standard of care (SoC), Nafamostat or an alternative therapy. Nafamostat was administered as an intravenous infusion at a dose of 0.2mg/kg/hour for a maximum of seven days. The analysis population included those who received any dose of the trial drug and all patients randomised to SoC.Results: Data is reported from 42 patients, 21 of which were randomly assigned to receive intravenous Nafamostat. 78% of Nafamostat-treated patients experienced at least one AE compared to 57% of the SoC group. The Nafamostat group developed significantly higher plasma creatinine levels and had a lower number of oxygen free days (posterior mean difference 10.57 micromol/L, 95% HPD interval 2.43 - 18.92, rate ratio 0.55- 95% HPD interval 0.31- 0.99 respectively). There were no other statistically significant differences in endpoints between Nafamostat and SoC. PK data demonstrated that intravenous Nafamostat was rapidly broken down to inactive metabolites. We observed no significant anticoagulant effects in thromboelastometry. Participants in the Nafamostat group had higher D-Dimers.Interpretation: In hospitalised patients with COVID-19, we did not observe evidence of anti-inflammatory, anticoagulant or antiviral activity with intravenous Nafamostat. Further evaluation of Nafamostat delivered via a different route may be warranted.Clinical Trial Registration Details: This trial has been registered on ISRCTN (https://www.isrctn.com/) ISRCTN14212905, and Clinicaltrials.gov (https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/) NCT04473053. Funding Information: DEFINE was funded by LifeArc (an independent medical research charity under the STOPCOVID award to the University of Edinburgh. We also thank the Oxford University COVID-19 Research Response Fund (BRD00230).Declaration of Interests: The authors report no conflict of interests.Ethics Approval Statement: The DEFINE trial has received full ethical approval from Scotland A REC (20/SS/0066), the MHRA (EudraCT 2020-002230-32) and NHS Lothian. Written informed consent was taken by trial clinicians prior to any trial procedures being performed. If a patient lacked capacity, consent could be provided by their next of kin.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pneumonia , White Coat HypertensionABSTRACT
Despite the success of vaccines and selected repurposed treatments, COVID-19 is likely to remain a global health problem and further chemotherapeutics are required. Many repurposed drugs have progressed rapidly to Phase 2 and 3 trials without characterisation of Pharmacokinetics (PK)/Pharmacodynamics (PD) including safety in COVID-19. One such drug is Nafamostat Mesylate (Nafamostat), a synthetic serine protease inhibitor with anticoagulant and anti-inflammatory properties. Preclinical data has demonstrated that it is has potent antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 by directly inhibiting the transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2) dependent stage of host cell entry. Methods: We present the findings of a phase Ib/II open label, platform randomised controlled trial (RCT), exploring the safety of intravenous Nafamostat in hospitalised patients with confirmed COVID-19 pneumonitis. Patients were assigned randomly to standard of care (SoC), Nafamostat or an alternative therapy. Secondary endpoints included clinical endpoints such as number of oxygen free days and clinical improvement/ deterioration, PK/PD, thromboelastometry, D Dimers, cytokines, immune cell flow cytometry and viral load. Results: Data is reported from 42 patients, 21 of which were randomly assigned to receive intravenous Nafamostat. The Nafamostat group developed significantly higher plasma creatinine levels, more adverse events and a lower number of oxygen free days. There were no other statistically significant differences in the primary or secondary endpoints between Nafamostat and SoC. PK data demonstrated that intravenous Nafamostat was rapidly broken down to inactive metabolites. We observed an antifibrinolytic profile, and no significant anticoagulant effects in thromboelastometry. Participants in the Nafamostat group had higher D Dimers compared to SoC. There were no differences in cytokine profile and immune cell phenotype and viral loads between the groups. Conclusion In hospitalised patients with COVID-19, we did not observe evidence of anti-inflammatory, anticoagulant or antiviral activity with intravenous Nafamostat. Given the number of negative trials with repurposed drugs, our experimental medicine trial highlights the value of PK/PD studies prior to selecting drugs for efficacy trials. Given the mechanism of action, further evaluation of Nafamostat delivered via a different route may be warranted. This trial demonstrates the importance of experimental trials in new disease entities such as COVID-19 prior to selecting drugs for larger trials.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , PneumoniaABSTRACT
Background: Tissue inflammation in fatal COVID-19 is concentrated in the lung and spleen. Anti-inflammatory therapy reduces mortality but knowledge on the host response at the level of inflamed tissues is incomplete. Methods: We performed targeted proteomic analysis of pulmonary and splenic tissues from 13 fatal cases of COVID-19 that underwent rapid autopsy, and compared to control tissues from cancer resection (lung) and deceased organ donors (spleen). Viral RNA presence was determined by multiplex PCR, and protein was isolated from tissue by phenol extraction. Targeted multiplex immunoassay panels were used for protein detection and quantification. Findings: Pulmonary proteins with increased abundance in COVID-19 included the monocyte/macrophage chemoattractant MCP-3, antiviral TRIM21 and pro-thrombotic TYMP. The lung injury markers OSM and EN-RAGE/S100A12 were highly correlated and associated with tissue inflammation severity. Unsupervised clustering of lung proteomes clearly defined two COVID-19 clusters; these differed by viral presence, tissue inflammation severity and illness duration and were annotated ‘early viral’ and ‘late inflammatory’ groups. In the spleen, lymphocyte chemotactic factors and CD8A were decreased in COVID-19, with pro-apoptotic factors, B-cell signalling components and macrophage colony stimulating factor (CSF-1) all increased. To contextualise our findings, we cross-referenced an existing meta-analysis of host factors in COVID-19 (MAIC). Overlap with a substantial sub-set of factors (including DDX58, OSM, TYMP, IL-18, MCP-3 and CSF-1) was found, with numerous additional proteins also identified by our study. Interpretation: Tissue proteomes from fatal COVID-19 identify disease subsets and dissect host immunopathologic signatures. In doing so, this may afford unique opportunities for therapeutic intervention.Funding Information: This work was funded by UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) (Coronavirus Disease [COVID-19] Rapid Response Initiative; MR/V028790/1 to C.D.L., D.A.D., and J.A.H.), LifeArc (through the University of Edinburgh STOPCOVID funding award, to K.D, D.A.D, C.D.L), The Chief Scientist Office (RARC-19 Funding Call, ‘Inflammation in Covid-19: Exploration of Critical Aspects of Pathogenesis; COV/EDI/20/10’ to D.A.D, C.D.L, C.D.R, J.K.B and D.J.H), and Medical Research Scotland (CVG-1722-2020 to DAD, CDL, CDR, JKB, and DJH). C.D.L is funded by a Wellcome Trust Clinical Career Development Fellowship (206566/Z/17/Z). J.K.B. and C.D.R. are supported by the Medical Research Council (grant MC_PC_19059) as part of the ISARIC Coronavirus Clinical Characterisation Consortium (ISARIC-4C). C.D.R. is supported by an Edinburgh Clinical Academic Track (ECAT)/Wellcome Trust PhD Training Fellowship for Clinicians award (214178/Z/18/Z). J.A.H. is supported by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (contract 75F40120C00085, Characterization of severe coronavirus infection in humans and model systems for medical countermeasure development and evaluation’). G.C.O is funded by an NRS Clinician award. N.N.G. is funded by a Pathological Society Award. A.R.A. is supported by a Cancer Research UK Clinician Scientist Fellowship award (A24867).Declaration of Interests: All authors have declared that no competing interests exist.Ethics Approval Statement: Written informed consent to undertake postmortem examinations was obtained from next-of-kin. Ethical approval was granted by the East of Scotland Research Ethics Service (16/ES/0084).